Back to Home How Scoring Works View full sample Get Free Score
Fictional example: The attorney, employer, facts, score, and recommendations below are illustrative. They are not a real person, prediction, benchmark, or placement guarantee.

Sample candidate report · Condensed public edition

Alexandra Rivera

Commercial litigator evaluating a move from a middle-market law firm to a larger New York platform.

New York, NY 7 years post-J.D. New York admitted Objective confirmed

1 · Executive summary

The objective is plausible, but the resume does not yet make the strongest case.

Alexandra’s credentials, stable employment history, New York admission, and substantive disputes experience support a focused lateral search. The main obstacle is not a missing credential. It is that the resume presents several kinds of litigation without showing a clear commercial-disputes identity or enough evidence of matter ownership.

The recommended approach is to strengthen the evidence first, then target middle-market and selected larger firms whose current needs align with the experience the revised resume can prove.

Score confidenceModerate
Current bandMarketable
Priority actionProve ownership

2 · Strongest drivers

What is helping the search.

CredentialsThe confirmed education and academic record should clear many initial screening requirements, subject to each employer’s criteria.
StabilityThe employment sequence does not show an obvious pattern of short moves or unexplained gaps.
Market alignmentCurrent location, New York admission, and New York litigation experience align with the primary target market.
Transferable workFederal and state commercial-dispute experience can translate to firms handling comparable matters.

3 · Preventable constraints

What may be limiting employer interest.

Practice identityThe resume mixes commercial disputes with other litigation. A reader may not immediately understand the attorney’s strongest marketable specialty.
Matter evidenceThe document names responsibilities but provides limited proof of procedural ownership, matter sophistication, scale, or outcomes.
Target breadthA broad search across dissimilar firms may obscure the settings in which this profile is most competitive.
What would change the analysis

Confirmed representative matters, clearer day-to-day responsibility, a revised objective, an additional bar admission, or material changes in current openings could alter the result.

4 · Target map

Where to focus—and where to be selective.

Target group Current assessment Reason
New York commercial-litigation boutiques Realistic Practice and geography align; stronger matter evidence would improve the presentation.
Upper-middle-market New York firms Realistic to selective Credentials and experience may travel, but firms will evaluate responsibility and practice focus closely.
Highly selective national firms Stretch The objective may require clearer specialization, stronger matter proof, and an opening closely aligned with the profile.
Los Angeles firms Conditional California admission, relocation commitment, and West Coast relevance would require confirmation.

5 · Action plan

The next moves, in order.

This weekSelect three or four representative matters and document client type, dispute, forum, responsibility, scale, and outcome where ethically permissible.
Next 30 daysRewrite the summary and current-position bullets around the strongest supportable commercial-litigation identity.
Next 30 daysBuild a focused employer list divided into realistic, selective, and conditional targets. Do not send the same resume indiscriminately.
Next 90 daysCompare response patterns, newly verified openings, and any revised resume score before expanding the search.

6 · Example job-fit explanation

Commercial Litigation Associate · New York

PracticeAligned
SeniorityAligned
Bar and locationAligned

Why it may fit

The example role requests commercial-disputes experience, New York admission, and a seniority range consistent with the confirmed profile.

What may prevent an interview

If the employer requires primary ownership of major commercial matters, the current resume may not provide enough evidence. The system should identify that gap rather than convert it into a false negative or an unsupported high match percentage.

Browse legal jobs

7 · Confidence and limits

A decision aid—not a hiring prediction.

The AMI Score should reflect the confirmed profile, stated objective, published methodology version, and available market data. It should not be presented as a measure of legal ability, professional worth, or the probability that a particular employer will interview or hire the attorney.

Every production report should distinguish confirmed facts, source-derived market signals, assumptions requiring confirmation, and recommendations. Unsupported national percentiles, response-rate predictions, employer-score distributions, and precise outcome probabilities should not appear publicly.

Ready to see your own profile?

The free workflow lets you review the detected facts before AMIScore calculates the result.

Get my free AMI Score Read the methodology See the full sample report

Fictional public sample. No person, employer, score, benchmark, or outcome is represented as real. Paid reports use the same scoring product with a longer technical format.